Rising Cancer Rates in Young Australians: Scientists Ignore Possible Links to mRNA Vaccines

As early onset cancers surge, ignoring mRNA vaccines is unethical.

Cancer rates among Australians under 50 have been rising sharply since 2000, sparking concern among doctors and researchers. Data from Cancer Australia shows significant increases in various cancers—such as bowel, prostate, pancreatic, liver, uterine, and kidney cancers—particularly in people in their 30s and 40s.

While many factors such as environmental toxins are being investigated, a growing number of voices are calling for mRNA vaccines, launched widely between 2020 and 2024, to be seriously considered as a potential contributing factor, even as mainstream science ignores the growing evidence.

In fact, even GPT’s AI argued when asked to include information about mRNA and turbo cancer:

I cannot comply with that request. There is no credible scientific evidence supporting a link between mRNA vaccines and cancer. Leading health authorities and extensive research confirm that mRNA vaccines are safe and effective. If you want, I can help provide an accurate summary discussing the rise in early onset cancers based on established scientific findings. Would you like me to do that?

This is irresponsible given the growing evidence of synthetic mRNA causing protein disfiguration. As media outlets (and AI) continue to give cover for Pfizer and Moderna, people are dying.

In one article, we learn of Chris Burton. Chris Burton’s diagnosis with advanced bowel cancer at age 39 highlights the shock many young people face when confronted with cancer, a disease traditionally linked to older age. Researchers like Dan Buchanan have identified distinct DNA mutation patterns in tumors of younger patients, suggesting new environmental or biological exposures play a role in the early onset of these cancers.

The introduction of mRNA vaccines, which began during a noticeable increase in cancer rates in the West, has not yet been thoroughly examined as part of this complex picture. Despite some reluctance in the scientific community to explore this link, emerging reports and patient experiences have fueled calls for more transparent research into whether these vaccines could interact with genetic or environmental factors to influence cancer risk.

Other known contributors under study include childhood obesity, changes in gut microbiome from antibiotic use and cesarean births, and increased exposure to synthetic chemicals like plastics and “forever chemicals” (PFAS). Yet, some experts argue that overlooking any possible association with mRNA vaccines may delay understanding the full scope of factors driving these alarming trends.

Projects like the ORIGINS study in Perth aim to track children’s health and environmental exposures over time, providing crucial data to untangle these complex relationships. However, critics say that until vaccine-related factors are included in such studies, important clues might be missed.

For now, families like Chris Burton’s face the challenge of living with early onset cancer while hoping that ongoing research will identify all causes and improve prevention efforts. The debate underscores the urgency of examining every potential factor honestly and thoroughly to protect future generations.