The "Global Majority": Systemic Discrimination Against Whites in UK Government Jobs

How academia is setting the stage for genocide

People on social media are rightly lambasting the City of Westminster, located in the heart of London, for actively discriminating against white applicants in a job listing for an executive assistant. Who do they want to hire? Someone from the alleged "Global Majority."

The job listing includes a ludicrous, long-winded paragraph explaining exactly what they want:

people who are Black, Asian, Brown, dual-heritage, indigenous to the global south, and or have been racialised as ’ethnic minorities’ (formally known as B.A.M.E, Black, Asian and multiple ethnic)

Here’s the full paragraph:

The Council is committed to achieving diverse shortlists to support our desire to increase the number of staff from underrepresented groups in our workforce. We especially encourage applications from a Global Majority (GM), people who are Black, Asian, Brown, dual-heritage, indigenous to the global south, and or have been racialised as ’ethnic minorities’ (formally known as B.A.M.E, Black, Asian and multiple ethnic) background and, while the role is open to all applicants, we will utilise the positive action provisions of the Equality Act 2010 to appoint a candidate from a global majority background where there is a choice between two candidates of equal merit. If you are from a Global Majority background you can self-declare this to the hiring manager as part of our positive action commitments.

And they claim that given two candidates of "equal merit," they will choose Anybody But the White Person.

This is in the UK, which is a native land for Caucasians.

First of all, there are never two candidates of exactly "equal" merit. One candidate will have a slight edge for various reasons...better interviewing skills, or a more pertinent job history.

This job advertising is basically a rambling way of saying "Whites Need Not Apply." The City of Westminster has already decided they don’t want a white person in the position, and if you are a white person and for some reason you did get hired, you can expect a potentially hostile workplace.

We should also note here that "women" are not included in the desired applicants. Previously white women benefited from diversity hiring, but they are quickly being shafted for non-white anybody. AWFULs (Affluent White Female Urban Liberals) haven’t fully felt the brunt of the New Discrimination like white men have, but it’s here now. Will they vote differently once they start losing their jobs? We’ll see.

Increasingly, woke people are trying to figure out bigger and "better" ways of saying "Everybody But White People." Here in the US, the historic term was "minorities." Now that they’ve purposefully opened the borders, the US is on track to have whites become the minority. So they need a new name.

For a while, "people of color" was the preferred term of "minorities." For some reason, this has now fallen out of favor.

One of the popular new names in the US is "BIPOC," which stands for Black, Indigenous, People of Color, but that’s a bit nonsensical. Are they saying Blacks (now with a Capital B) are not also people of color? (Technically, white people are too. In reality, whites are porcelain, peach, or olive people. Personally, I identify as an Olive person.) The UK used to use BAME, as mentioned in the job description, but I guess that’s passe now too.

The Global Majority is now a preferred term in many quarters. Where does it come from? From bitter, envious leftist academics who hide their hatred, self-hatred, and racism in a lot of fluffy language.

I used a reference-generating AI to get a little background on the Global Majority term. Here’s what it said:

---

The term "Global Majority" emerged in scholarly discourse as a response to the historical and ongoing dynamics of power, representation, and identity in a world where the majority of the population resides in regions often referred to as the Global South. This term is used to highlight the demographic reality that the majority of the world’s population is composed of people from non-Western countries, particularly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, who have historically been marginalized in global discussions and decision-making processes.

Historical Context

1. Colonial Legacy: The concept of a "Global Majority" can be traced back to the colonial era when European powers dominated much of the world, leading to the subjugation and exploitation of various populations. The legacy of colonialism has resulted in persistent inequalities that continue to shape global relations today.

2. Post-Colonial Studies: In the latter half of the 20th century, post-colonial studies began to critically examine the impacts of colonialism and the narratives constructed around race, identity, and power. Scholars sought to give voice to those who had been historically oppressed and to challenge the Eurocentric perspectives that dominated academic discourse.

3. Demographic Realities: The term "Global Majority" gained traction as demographic studies highlighted that over 80% of the world’s population lives in developing countries. This demographic shift prompted scholars and activists to advocate for a more inclusive understanding of global issues that recognizes the perspectives and experiences of these populations.

Scholarly Usage

1. Social Justice and Equity: The term is often employed in discussions about social justice, equity, and representation. It serves to remind scholars and policymakers that the voices and needs of the majority of the world’s population must be considered in global governance, development policies, and environmental discussions.

2. Critique of Dominant Narratives: By using "Global Majority," scholars aim to critique the dominant narratives that often center on Western experiences and perspectives. This term seeks to reframe discussions around global issues, emphasizing the importance of diverse voices and experiences.

3. Racial and Ethnic Dynamics: The term also intersects with discussions about race and ethnicity, as it challenges the notion that whiteness is the default or normative identity in global contexts. It seeks to dismantle the racial hierarchies that have historically marginalized non-white populations in academic and policy discussions.

Conclusion

In summary, the term "Global Majority" emerged as a scholarly response to the historical injustices of colonialism, the demographic realities of the contemporary world, and the need for inclusive discourse that recognizes the voices of those who have been historically marginalized. It serves as a tool for advocating social justice and equity in global discussions, challenging dominant narratives that prioritize Western perspectives.

This term is not intended to blame or vilify any group, including white populations, but rather to highlight the need for a more equitable representation of the world’s diverse populations in scholarly and policy discussions.

---

The AI is naive. Of course the term Global Majority is designed to vilify white people and white culture.

You will instantly see that the term Global Majority isn’t just about race, it’s a heavily loaded term that implies that the "Eurocentric" way is tainted by colonialism...in layman’s terms: "white people are bad."

No, they don’t say that outright, but it’s implied throughout.

The concept of "colonialism" in modern academic discourse is primarily targeted at grievances related to the recent British conquest of much of the world the 1800s. It doesn’t care about the colonialism of the Mongols, the Ottomans, the Muslims, or the Japanese during WWII. All they care about is white colonialism.

There is oddly a thread of racism in their own analysis, because when woke academics call the so-called non-Eurocentric countries "developing," they make them out to be "less than" and imply that the Western idea of material success is more important than other things, such as strong communities.

The idea of "historically marginalized non-white populations" is also racist and myopic, as it ignores thousands of years of civilization in places like India and China. It ignores the Ethiopian empire of yore. It falsely portrays white people as somehow controlling the entire world for thousands of years, when the British colonial period is but a blip in history.

Why focus so heavily on white colonialism?

Leftist racism is built on two things: looking down on the groups they claim to help and envy. So they simultaneously act like the so-called oppressed are inferior while blaming the supposedly superior group for oppression. It’s a racism that is built heavily on grievance and group jealousy.

In short, it’s the same character issue that led to the Nazi’s attempted extinction of the Jews. It’s no accident that leftist academics quickly picked up the banner of the Palestinians and vilified Israeli Jews. Leftist racism is built on the following formula:

Oppressor has more stuff than the inferior group has because it stole from and oppressed the inferior group, which is incapable of helping itself without taking stuff back through force.

This justifies the genocide of people like the Jews.

I want to make it clear, I don’t believe people of the so-called Global South are inferior. I do believe that leftist academics deep down inside think they are.

As one X users points out:

It makes no sense to single out whites on a global scale, unless you have nefarious purposes. The language shift to “global majority” is ominous.

It’s ominous, because language like this is used to justify genocide.

Action steps:

Contact the City of Westminster and complain (don’t threaten or use foul language, be smart):

https://www.westminster.gov.uk/

IMPORTANT: The UK has been arresting its citizens and threatening to extradite Americans who go against their woke speech policies. I recommend using a VPN/proxy and an anonymous name/email address to contact Westminster. It’s sad that I even need to write this.

Contact ZipRecruiter and ask (professionally) to have them remove racist job listings: https://www.ziprecruiter.co.uk/jobs/357712898-executive-assistant-wcc619758-at-shared-services-partnership

---

Bibliography:

Abubakar, A., Costa, A. B., Cui, L., Koller, S. H., Nwafor, C. E., & Raval, V. V. (2024). Towards a decolonial developmental science: Adolescent development in the Majority World taking center stage. Journal of Research on Adolescence.

America, N., Yancy, A. J., Lee, B. R., Kuebbing, S., Neufeld, H. S., Spicer, M., & Mason, J. (2023). Evaluating the definition and distribution of spring ephemeral wildflowers in eastern North America. bioRxiv.

Andri Nirwana, A. N., Mahmudulhassan, M., Marshal, F. D., Muthoifin, M., & Fadli, N. (2024). Human rights and social justice in Quranic contexts: a global trend. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum.

Begeny, J., Wang, J., Hida, R. M., Oluokun, H. O., & Jones, R. A. (2019). A global examination of peer-reviewed, scholarly journal outlets devoted to school and educational psychology. School Psychology International, 40, 547–580.

Bellizzi, S., Popescu, C., Napodano, C. P. P., Fiamma, M., & Cegolon, L. (2023). Global health, climate change and migration: The need for recognition of “climate refugees.” Journal of Global Health, 13.

Berkebile, R. E. (2017). What Is Domestic Terrorism? A Method for Classifying Events From the Global Terrorism Database. Terrorism and Political Violence, 29, 1–26.

Bouzereau, E., & Carissimo, B. (2007). NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE On the Definition of the Cloud Water Content Fluctuations and Its Effects on the Computation of a Second-Order Liquid Water Correlation.

Bowen, B., Luedtke, J., Holt, T., Fink, M. M., & Watson, H. M. (2016). Leveraging the Dissemination of Scholarly Works.

Bronson, R., Gupta, C., Manson, A., Nguyen, J., Bahadirli-Talbott, A., Parrish, N., Earl, A., & Cohen, K. (2021). Global phylogenomic analyses of Mycobacterium abscessus provide context for non cystic fibrosis infections and the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nature Communications, 12.

Cabral, B., & Salles-Filho, S. (2024). Insights and influences: mapping the scientific contributors to global foresight policies. Foresight.

Cason, M., Young, J., & Young, J. (2024). Your favourite authors favourite authors: a bibliometric social network analysis of hip-hop education literature. Multicultural Learning and Teaching.

Caywood, K., & Darmstadt, G. L. (2024). Gender mainstreaming at 25 years: Toward an inclusive, collaborative, and structured research agenda. Journal of Global Health, 14.

Clerc, C., Aumont, O., & Bopp, L. (2023). Filter‐feeding gelatinous macrozooplankton response to climate change and implications for benthic food supply and global carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 29, 6383–6398.

Cornelius-Hernandez, T., & Clarke, A. (2024). The current state of integrating equity, diversity and inclusion into knowledge mobilization: a systematic literature review. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal.

Costa, V. A., & Holmes, E. C. (2024). Diversity, evolution, and emergence of fish viruses. Journal of Virology, 98.

Dagli, R. J., & Sharma, A. (2014). Polypharmacy: A Global Risk Factor for Elderly People. Journal of International Oral Health, 6, i–ii.

Dalal, S., & Singh, S. (2025). Gratitude in Action: Effect of Gratitude on Mental Health. Journal of Health Management.

Degterev, D. (2024). Collective Self-Reliance: Restarting the Concept in the Sahel in the Context of a Multipolarizing World Order. Uchenie Zapiski Instituta Afriki RAN.

Douglas, N. O., Bustos, V., Moroni, E., Bustos, S. S., Lee, B. T., & Cruz, C. (2022). Who Cares about Diversity? Trends in Gender and Racial Authorship and Publications in Plastic Surgery over Time. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open, 10.

Dunbar, R. B., Greeson, K., & Affolter, E. (2023). The healing trifecta: a collaborative autoethnography on intersectionality, motherhood, and pedagogy during a global pandemic. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37, 1249–1262.

Etges, A., & Dean, D. (2022). The International Council of Museums and the Controversy about a New Museum Definition – A Conversation with Lauran Bonilla-Merchav, Bruno Brulon Soares, Lonnie G. Bunch III, Bernice Murphy, and Michèle Rivet. International Public History, 5, 19–27.

Ferreira, R., Santos, E., Gossec, L., & Silva, J. P. D. (2020). THU0135 PATIENT GLOBAL ASSESSMENT LEVELS PRECLUDE THE MAJORITY OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS OTHERWISE IN REMISSION, FROM REACHING THIS STATUS: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND META-ANALYSES INCLUDING 23,297 PATIENTS. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

Garapich, M., Jochymek, A., & Soborski, R. (2024). Immigrants in the Transnational Far Right: Integration through Racisms and Negotiating White Supremacy in a Migratory Context. International Migration Review.

Girard, T. (2021). Participatory ambiguity and the emergence of the global financial inclusion agenda. Review of International Political Economy, 29, 1698–1722.

Handayani, K., Sijbranda, T., Westenberg, M. A., Rossell, N., Sitaresmi, M., Kaspers, G., & Mostert, S. (2020). Global Problem of Hospital Detention Practices. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 9, 319–326.

Hasnat, G. T. (2021). A Time Series Analysis of Forest Cover and Land Surface Temperature Change Over Dudpukuria-Dhopachari Wildlife Sanctuary Using Landsat Imagery. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4.

Haugevik, K., & Svendsen, Ø. (2023). On safer ground? The emergence and evolution of ‘Global Britain.’ International Affairs.

Hei-Hayes Tang. (2014). The scholarship of application in the context of academic entrepreneurialism. Asian Education and Development Studies, 3, 292–302.

Huzairin, R. A., & Multazam, M. (2022). Dataset: Mapping Online Business and Commitment: Insights from Global Scholarly Works. Proceedings of the ICECRS.

Ilcus, C. (2024). CENTRAL ASIAN REGIONALISM - GEOPOLITICAL DYNAMICS AND GLOBAL STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review.

Jørgensen, P., Böhning‐Gaese, K., Thorup, K., Tøttrup, A. P., Chylarecki, P., Jiguet, F., Lehikoinen, A., Noble, D., Reif, J., Schmid, H., Turnhout, C. V., Burfield, I., Foppen, R., Voříšek, P., Strien, A. V., Gregory, R., & Rahbek, C. (2016). Continent‐scale global change attribution in European birds ‐ combining annual and decadal time scales. Global Change Biology, 22.

Kano, M., Rosenberg, P., & Dalton, S. D. (2018). A Global Pilot Study of Age-Friendly City Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 138, 1205–1227.

Kulovesi, K., Mehling, M., & Morgera, E. (2019). Global Environmental Law: Context and Theory, Challenge and Promise. Transnational Environmental Law, 8, 405–435.

Lai, Y., Tang, S., Lambers, H., Hietz, P., Tang, W., Gilliam, F. S., Lu, X., Luo, X., Lin, Y., Wang, S., Zeng, F., Wang, Q., & Kuang, Y. (2024). Global change progressively increases foliar nitrogen–phosphorus ratios in China’s subtropical forests. Global Change Biology, 30.

Luppi, A., Gellersen, H. M., Liu, Z.-Q., Peattie, A. R. D., Manktelow, A., Adapa, R., Owen, A. M., Naci, L., Menon, D. K., Dimitriadis, S., & Stamatakis, E. (2024). Systematic evaluation of fMRI data-processing pipelines for consistent functional connectomics. Nature Communications, 15.

Macaro, E., Hultgren, A., Kirkpatrick, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2017). English medium instruction: Global views and countries in focus. Language Teaching, 52, 231–248.

Mahali, A., Lynch, I., Fadiji, A., Tolla, T., Khumalo, S., & Naicker, S. (2018). Networks of Well-being in the Global South: A Critical Review of Current Scholarship. Journal of Developing Societies, 34, 373–400.

Maksymowych, W., Baraliakos, X., Weber, U., Machado, P., Pedersen, S. J., Sieper, J., Wichuk, S., Poddubnyy, D., Rudwaleit, M., Heijde, D. M., Landewé, R., Paschke, J., Lambert, R., & Østergaard, M. (2020). OP0079 PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF A POSITIVE MRI FOR STRUCTURAL LESIONS IN THE SACROILIAC JOINTS IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

Mamari, J. M. Z. A., Murshed, A. A. M., Raja Sulong, R. H., Sarif, S. B., Lubis, M. R. B. M. @ M. A., Mamari, S. S. A. A., Harthi, A. H. A. A., & Eisaei, M. S. A. (2024). Crisis Management in Islamic Perspectives: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Trends. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.

Manley, E., & Mayes, A. (2021). Situating Blackness and Antiracism in a Global Frame: Key Works for a Study of the Dominican Republic. Kalfou.

Mansour, E. A. H. (2016). Arab authors’ perceptions about the scholarly publishing and refereeing system used in Emerald’s library and information science journals. New Library World, 117, 414–439.

Marfo, K. (2024). Toward a globally inclusive knowledge base on adolescent development: A charge to the Majority World and a plea for epistemic and paradigmatic pluralism. Journal of Research on Adolescence.

Maritz, A., Li, A., Utami, W., & Sumaji, Y. (2022). The emergence of entrepreneurship education programs in Indonesian higher education institutions. Entrepreneurship Education, 5, 289–317.

Miao, Y. (2024). Privilege and Prejudice: Han Victimhood and Legitimizing Islamophobia in China. The China Quarterly.

Mitlin, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2012). Urban Poverty in the Global South: Scale and Nature.

Mohamed, A., & Wali, M. A. (2023). A One Health look into the emergence of zoonotic viruses at the human-animal-environment interface. CABI One Health.

Montgomery, L. (2014). Knowledge Unlatched: A Global Library Consortium Model for Funding Open Access Scholarly Books. Cultural Science Journal, 7, 1–66.

Mustafa, C., & Komalasari, R. (2024). Harmony Unveiled: Sharia Law and Human Rights in Dubai’s Justice. Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora.

Nair, V., Farah, W., & Boveda, M. (2024). Is neurodiversity a Global Northern White paradigm? Autism, 13623613241280835.

Neupane, D., & Lourdusamy, A. (2024a). Bibliometric Insights into Anger and Aggression Research. NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research.

Neupane, D., & Lourdusamy, A. (2024b). Unveiling Global Trends in Reactive and Proactive Aggression: A Cutting-Edge Bibliometric Analysis. NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research.

Niyazbaeva, A. A., & Ospanov, D. E. (2024). THE ROLE OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL ORIENTATION OF YOUNG PEOPLE AND ITS IMPACT ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE COUNTRY. Central Asian Economic Review.

Oo, K. (2023). Climatology Definition of the Myanmar Southwest Monsoon (MSwM): Change Point Index (CPI). Advances in Meteorology.

Orechova, M. (2021). Internationalisation of Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe: Conceptualisation of the Definition Inside the Region. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia.

Phoenix, G., & Khafsha, A. H. (2023). Untangling the influences of air quality and climate change on biodiversity in space and time. Global Change Biology, 29, 5115–5116.

Pizzichini, M., Rocha, C., Souza Tavares, M. G., Steidle, L., Silva, R. M., Pizzol, F., Gibson, P., & Pizzichini, E. (2019). How does the GINA definition of control correlate with quality of life and sputum cellularity? ERJ Open Research, 5.

Poniatowski, D., Beckmann, C., Löffler, F., Münsch, T., Helbing, F., Samways, M., & Fartmann, T. (2020). Relative impacts of land‐use and climate change on grasshopper range shifts have changed over time. Global Ecology and Biogeography.

Potenza, M., & Mechanick, J. (2009). The metabolic syndrome: definition, global impact, and pathophysiology. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 24 5, 560–577.

Providence, K.-J. (2023). DEFINE AND EMPOWER: Black Feminist Discourse in a Caribbean Context. Caribbean Quilt.

Purnomo, J. H., & Hidayati, N. (2024). Looking at the Spread of Precarious Employment Researches: A Literature Review. Fenomena.

Recognition, Majority Backlash. (2023).

Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Alnabulsi, K., & Zailani, S. (2023). Tracing Knowledge Diffusion Trajectories in Scholarly Bitcoin Research: Co-Word and Main Path Analyses. Journal of Risk and Financial Management.

Ribhi, Y., Djellouli, N., Akter, K., Payne, W., Kinney, M., Mwaba, K., Seruwagi, G., English, M., Marchant, T., Qcn, T., Group, E., Shiffman, J., Colbourn, T., & Shawar, Dr. Y. R. (2023). Factors Shaping Network Emergence: A Cross-Country Comparison of Quality of Care Networks in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda. medRxiv.

Roguska-Németh, M. (2024). Pojęcie transkulturowości w węgierskojęzycznej refleksji literaturoznawczej. Wielogłos.

Sabadash, V., Chorna, Y., & Falko, K. (2020). International Logistics Systems: Research of Transformations under the Influence of Recession and Definition of Perspective Directions of Logistics Architecture Development. 70–80.

Salewski, V., Siebenrock, K., Hochachka, W., Woog, F., & Fiedler, W. (2014). Morphological Change to Birds over 120 Years Is Not Explained by Thermal Adaptation to Climate Change. PLoS ONE, 9.

Savastieieva, O., Borysova, L., Zhuravlova, T. O., & Butenko, V. V. (2022). NATIONAL HEALTH FINANCING SYSTEMS AGAINST THE BACKDROP OF A GLOBAL PANDEMIC: NEW CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS. Wiadomosci Lekarskie, 75 5 pt 2, 1390–1394.

Schmitt, C., Lierse, H., Obinger, H., & Seelkopf, L. (2015). The Global Emergence of Social Protection. Politics & Society, 43, 503–524.

Servadei, F., Cannizzaro, D., & Safa, A. (2023). The Role of WFNS in Global Neurosurgery. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL NEUROSURGERY.

Shawar, Y., Djellouli, N., Akter, K., Payne, W., Kinney, M., Mwaba, K., Seruwagi, G., English, M., Marchant, T., Shiffman, J., & Colbourn, T. (2024). Factors shaping network emergence: A cross-country comparison of quality of care networks in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda. PLOS Global Public Health, 4.

Shebanina, O. (2023). Global Aspects of Food Security in the World: Economic Dimensions. Modern Economy.

Shepherd, G. W. (1987). Global Majority Rights: The African Context. Africa Today, 34, 13–26.

Shruti, S., Trivedi, A., Chaudhary, K., & Ghadiali, J. (2024). Global Climate Change and Its Effects on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: A Review Article. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change.

Strube, J. (2023). The Emergence of “Esoteric” as a Comparative Category. Implicit Religion.

Tachibana, T. (2019). Commentary to “the Review for Promoting Evidence-based Healthcare and Welfare Policies for People with Disabilities”: Why is the “Definition of Health for a Care-focused Mature Society” we proposed needed in Japan? Health Education and Public Health.

Tansel, C. B., & Tilley, L. (2024). Reproducing socio-ecological life from below: Towards a planetary political economy of the global majority. Review of International Studies, 50, 514–533.

The publication of Urban Health in Developing Countries by Trudy Harpham and Marcel Tanner in 1995 triggered a new generation of scholarship acknowledging the crucial relationship between urbanization, poverty and health in the context of the global South (Harpham,. (2019).

Troco, A. A. (2020). ENTRE A POLÍTICA DOMÉSTICA E A POLÍTICA GLOBAL: OS DETERMINANTES PARA A SECESSÃO BEM-SUCEDIDA DA ERITREIA. 4.

Wickert, C., Potočnik, K., Prashantham, S., Shi, W., & Snihur, Y. (2024). Embracing non‐Western Contexts in Management Scholarship. Journal of Management Studies.

Wilson, I. M., Willoughby, B., Tanyos, A., Graham, K., Walker, M., Laslett, A., & Ramsoomar, L. (2024). A global review of the impact on women from men’s alcohol drinking: the need for responding with a gendered lens. Global Health Action, 17.

Yancy, A. J., Lee, B. R., Kuebbing, S., Neufeld, H. S., Spicer, M., & Heberling, J. M. (2024). Evaluating the definition and distribution of spring ephemeral wildflowers in eastern North America. American-Eurasian Journal of Botany, e16323.

Young, A. Y. (2017). The anthropology of Pentecostalism in Africa and along its transformative routes: A review essay. Pentecost Journal of Theology and Mission.