47 Comments

Wasnt practically the whole works talking peace recently-rightvafyer the US election? This shows who the evil ones really are, those who refuse to see it put us all in danger

Expand full comment

I listen to something, and if you have an Apple podcast, you can listen

this is what's been going on the last three days and of course our government in America wants to send another $275 million to Ukraine, which we already bought Ukraine when Obama was in office but you know it's just the way it is

of course it the taxpayers money and this administration is trying to make it really bad for the next one coming in so I'm gonna post all three podcast from the last three days for those who don't know what's going on.

As far as Ellen degenerate, she could just pack her bags and get that one-way ticket and go ahead and head out !

Please Listen!!!!!

for the 18th

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s2-underground/id1498568096?i=1000677381059

for the 19th

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s2-underground/id1498568096?i=1000677545588

for the 20th

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s2-underground/id1498568096?i=1000677697058

God bless everyone and please be safe and stay vigilant 🙏⚔️💪💯

Expand full comment

Ultimately, the Stormshadow is a cruise missile munition with slightly less range than ATACMS. In terms of what it brings to the Ukrainian armed forces it is approximately equivalent to ATACMS.

Most cruciially Stormshadow can be used against all the same sorts of rear area targests as ATACMS.

This strike is really a sort of "Me Too" message from the UK basically going along with Biden's earlier authorization of ATACMS. In terms of escalations, it doesn't change things much if at all.

Putin's dilemma remains the same as with ATACMS. Aside from saber rattling and launching more missiles at Ukraine, he doesn't have a wide range of options available for retaliation. His only options for striking at the UK or the US are nuclear ones, and that would be quite literally signing his death warrant, as both the UK and the US have ample strike capacity to incinerate the Kremlin--and from what we have seen of Russia's defensive measures, there is not much if anything Putin can do to prevent it.

At the same time, a conventional strike against Poland triggers Article V and brings in all of NATO--which at a minimum would mean Russian oil exports out of the Baltic (and very likely the Black Sea) are completely halted. Putin can get around sanctions. He can't get around having 1/3 of his oil export capacity completely shut down.

Perversely, we're still in the same position where the best outcome for the Kremlin is the status quo of attritional war. That war is just going to be a bit pricier for Russia now.

Expand full comment

Nonsense. Putin has all kinds of options. He can use thermobaric mega-bombs to level Kiev. And destroy the Ukraine's entire power generation for the cold winter ahead. And continue arming Syria & Iran with advanced weapons. Bleeding US troops in the region. As well as more Nordstream type terrorist attacks done by NATO already against Russia. They can devastate Europe's pipelines infrastructure, like they did a communications cable via a Chinese trawler that "forgot" to lift its anchor.

The problem is when you put confrontations like that on a hair trigger, unpredictable shit can happen as came within a hair's breath of happening during the Cuban missile crisis. One of 3 submarine commanders blocked an order to fire nuclear torpedoes at the US fleet.

US/NATO actually attacking Russian Strategic missile radars, that alone could trigger a nuclear war.

Play with fire and you will get burnt. The NATO/USSA's owners are psychopaths and putting our entire civilization at risk. Incredibly stupid, and totally ineffective unless it is to create more crises like their invented Covid Plandemic.

The Very Real Threat Of Global Nuclear War - Annie Jacobsen

Chris Williamson:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R0PRhc7qvI

"...The threat of nuclear war has loomed for over half a century now. But the question remains - just how close to nuclear armageddon are we and what would happen if the world went into a nuclear war.

Expect to learn how many nukes there are in the world right now, the most likely steps to an accidental nuclear war, what happens when a country fires the first nuke, which cities are the most likely targets of a nuclear strike, what the most powerful bomb in history was, how many people would die in a nuclear war between the US and Russia, how likely a nuclear war is in our future and much more...."

Expand full comment

Peter, let’s suppose that Putin feels compelled to punish the UK, but doesn’t use nukes. If Russia took out Landon’s electrical grid in a way that destroyed it for months, do you know if existing doctrines and treaties spell out what the response from NATO could be?

Expand full comment

There are two ways Putin could disrupt the UK power grid.

One would be with a massive Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP). The way to generate one is to detonate a nuclear weapon.

The other would be some form of cyberattack on the power grid. In theory that might be done where it doesn't trace back to Russia, but that would rather defeat the purpose of retaliation.

Any "retaliation" by Putin against the UK is going to trigger Article V. Once Article V is triggered, there would be a consultation but the end result at this point is a foregone conclusion: NATO would be at war with Russia, and that would drag alll of NATO along for the ride.

Turkey would have to quit straddling the fence and either exit NATO or join in--which would mean that Russia's Black Sea oil terminal at Novorossysk gets shut down along with the Baltic terminals at Primorsk and Ust-Luga.

Not sure how long Russia can sustain its economy with those three oil terminals shut down. Russia can't supply China's oil needs with just the pipelines it has in the east.

War with NATO gets really ugly for the Russian economy really quickly.

Expand full comment

No he can cut submarine cables which the UK is highly dependent upon and very difficult to repair. It took Australia 6 months to repair a cable to Tasmania.

And he can also blame it on the UK just as the US/NATO blamed Russia for blowing up their own pipelines.

And NATO ain't going to war with Russia. They know damn well that would be suicide. Unless they really are owned by demented Psychopaths who are willing to burn the World to the ground so they can rule over the ashes.

The real problem is their continual efforts to provoke Russia, might cause a nuclear event that could snowball out of control. What's with Ukraine trying to attack the Kursk NPPs, which are two Chernobyl type reactors?

Expand full comment

"Unless they really are owned by demented Psychopaths who are willing to burn the World to the ground so they can rule over the ashes".

Well there's the problem right there.

Expand full comment

EMP would be my guess. then they could blame it on the sun 🤔

Expand full comment

Climate change did it!

Expand full comment

In conjunction with those evil nationalists / far right / normal working class people, who are blamed for everything by the government / media / police / judiciary.

Expand full comment

oh yeah, there's the answer

not the natural climate change

the climate change caused by geoengineering and weather manipulation

https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/links-to-geoengineering-patents/

click on the first number and it'll open up the Patent

Expand full comment

Good to know - ANY retaliation by Russia triggers Article V. Russia really has to either stalemate until Trump offers him a way out, or take a course of action that will be highly likely to result in his own death.

Expand full comment

Just remember that there is no time when a man is more dangerous than when his back is against the wall and he has no way out.

Up until now, Putin's "red lines" have been just a bluff. But "red lines" are always a bluff...until they aren't.

Putin is running a 19th century Great Power Competition playbook. Hegemonic power in that playbook is largely a matter of military power projection. Trading relationships are of lesser importance.

For their part, Biden, Lloyd Austin, and the rest of NATO are hoping for an ending in Ukraine similar to the ending of the Crimean War, in which Russia agreed to demilitarize the Black Sea in the 1856 Treaty of Paris. Indeed, there's a certain parallel between the NATO strategy in Ukraine and Lord Palmerston's strategy in Crimea as British Prime Minister: isolate Russia, weaken Russia, thene defeat Russia resoundingly.

The difference is that Tsar Alexander II didn't have nukes as his ace in the hole.

Expand full comment

Putin isn't doing zip. That's all nonsense. He warned NATO/USSA against moving into Ukraine, and they gave him a middle finger. He told them right up front, commit to a neutral Ukraine or he would invade. Kamala declared Ukraine would join NATO and Putin kept his word. Anyone thinks Putin wants to create a new Russian empire or recreate the USSR is an idiot. The real USSR now is NATO/EUSSR/USSA.

Expand full comment

Ukraine is a sovereign nation. Putin has ZERO to say about what Ukraine does with its foreign relations, and had ZERO justification for invading Ukraine.

Expand full comment

You see why I’m always calling you Magnificent Man? You are AMAZING. Thanks for all of your knowledge and wisdom on this, Peter!

Expand full comment

My greatest hope is no escalation. Ellen is disposable. England needs some serious humility, since they have gone full censorship. But bombing England for what Obama and company have initiated seems a stretch.

Putin has tolerated a lot of abuse. At this point a counter strike into Ukraine might be coming.

So elections state old guard Voted out,

yet 2 weeks after Americans speak Obiden wants to start a war, bc they hate Trump and America and are willing to Scorch earth, to protect their own crimes?

Expand full comment

"Tolerated a lot of abuse"? He invaded a free country. He's not any kind of victim.

Expand full comment

He invaded a (US proxy) threat to Russia after much provocation.

Expand full comment

Since time began, poking bears has proved to be a very dangerous game...especially for the one doing the poking.

Expand full comment

Sweden has issued 5 million pamphlets to its citizenry on how to prepare for World War 3.

If those pamphlets are honest, the instructions should say something like this:

1) Find a protected inner doorway and crouch down

2) Place your head between your knees

3) Kiss your ass goodbye.

Expand full comment

P.S don't forget to protect your immigrants from the Middle East, as they are more important than the indigenous Swedes.

Expand full comment