(1) no email I've ever printed has a heading saying from "[surname] to [givenname]"
(2) if whoever photographed this image was serious, they would have photographed it properly, centering the page and ensuring the entire thing was visible.
(3) wheres the rest of it? They would have photographed ALL pages
(4) what's with all the bleed-through and the word "REDACTED"? If it was bleeding through from the back of the page the text would be reversed.
No, it's clearly a printout that has been reformatted from an electronic message. You know, a ton of shills have been out in full force since this story broke immediately throwing shade on it for some odd reason instead of dealing with its actual contents.
What are the details of the war crime activities in the Nimruz Province of Afghanistan?
The allegations are "explosive" to put it mildly....IF they are true. "If" being the key word.
How do we ascertain if this email is true and factual? Accept for now that the email itself is legitimate and not a fabrication, how do we ascertain that the allegations themselves are true?
"Gravitic propulsion" has been a technological Holy Grail for decades, and while it is not explicitly ruled out by general relativity, how one would create the "negative mass" necessary goes rather beyond what is understood in physics today regarding gravity.
War crimes in Nimroz Province? Certainly a possibility, but if the UN bureaucracy were aware of the events, somehow those events have not made it into the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs "White Book" which details what it claims are the many war crimes committed by US forces in Afghanistan.
An attack of the magnitude described in the email is a curious omission from the White Book.
The claims are fantastic--but the evidence in support of those claims is not present in the email. Without evidence, what can we rationally make of the claims?
A better screenshot of the full email: https://x.com/ShawnRyan762/status/1875278600284635341
Just on that document alone;
(1) no email I've ever printed has a heading saying from "[surname] to [givenname]"
(2) if whoever photographed this image was serious, they would have photographed it properly, centering the page and ensuring the entire thing was visible.
(3) wheres the rest of it? They would have photographed ALL pages
(4) what's with all the bleed-through and the word "REDACTED"? If it was bleeding through from the back of the page the text would be reversed.
This is clearly fabricated.
No, it's clearly a printout that has been reformatted from an electronic message. You know, a ton of shills have been out in full force since this story broke immediately throwing shade on it for some odd reason instead of dealing with its actual contents.
Exactly what are the "contents"?
What are the evidences? What are the proofs?
What are the details of the war crime activities in the Nimruz Province of Afghanistan?
The allegations are "explosive" to put it mildly....IF they are true. "If" being the key word.
How do we ascertain if this email is true and factual? Accept for now that the email itself is legitimate and not a fabrication, how do we ascertain that the allegations themselves are true?
"Gravitic propulsion" has been a technological Holy Grail for decades, and while it is not explicitly ruled out by general relativity, how one would create the "negative mass" necessary goes rather beyond what is understood in physics today regarding gravity.
War crimes in Nimroz Province? Certainly a possibility, but if the UN bureaucracy were aware of the events, somehow those events have not made it into the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs "White Book" which details what it claims are the many war crimes committed by US forces in Afghanistan.
https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/historical_materials/1838877/
An attack of the magnitude described in the email is a curious omission from the White Book.
The claims are fantastic--but the evidence in support of those claims is not present in the email. Without evidence, what can we rationally make of the claims?