FDA Study Uncovers High DNA Contamination in Pfizer’s mRNA Covid Vaccine
Student-Led Research Reveals Safety Concerns, Possible Cancer Risk
A groundbreaking study conducted at the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) White Oak Campus has revealed alarmingly high levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer’s mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. The research, carried out by student scientists under FDA supervision, found DNA levels exceeding safety limits by 6 to 470 times. Published in the Journal of High School Science, the study challenges years of dismissals by regulatory authorities regarding DNA contamination concerns.
The student researchers used two main analytical techniques: NanoDrop and Qubit Analysis. Both methods confirmed DNA contamination beyond permissible thresholds, corroborating earlier findings from independent laboratories worldwide. Kevin McKernan, a former director of the Human Genome Project, criticized the FDA’s transparency and noted potential underestimations in contamination levels due to study limitations.
McKernan highlighted possible cancer risks associated with DNA fragments overstimulating the cGAS-STING pathway, a crucial immune response component. Despite the authors’ claims that detected SV40 promoter fragments are non-replicative in humans, McKernan expressed skepticism, suggesting more comprehensive sequencing could reveal functional fragments.
Nikolai Petrovsky, a Professor of Immunology, described the findings as a "smoking gun," emphasizing the FDA’s awareness of these data. He commended the students’ work, noting it filled a gap left by regulatory oversight. Petrovsky critiqued the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration’s testing methods as inadequate.
The study’s publication in a peer-reviewed journal places pressure on vaccine manufacturers and regulators. Addressing contamination may necessitate revising manufacturing processes, which Prof Petrovsky argues could be impractical without effectively creating a new vaccine.
Regulators are now urged to demonstrate plasmid DNA safety levels in vaccines to restore public confidence. The findings have sparked renewed scrutiny and demand for transparency from regulatory bodies in both the US and Australia, as they face increasing public skepticism.
More info here:
Given this and so many other negatives that are coming out about the mRNA vaccines, it's not surprising that Trump is considering banning them: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/trump-could-be-about-ban-covid-vaccines-report
Perhaps a better approach would be to strongly recommend against their use without banning them. That way it would be clear that the US Government respects the right of citizens to make their own medical decisions. (After all, people are free to self-medicate with cigarettes, vaping and alcohol - all arguably bad for the health of the individual but within the orbit of freedom of choice)