You’re proposing a 1/100 ratio but I’d estimate it’s closer to 100/1. Can you even give a few examples of conspiracy theories that have proven wrong? According to your statement there should be 1000’s to choose from.
And fucking with peoples brains isn’t malice? Bro you’re in a different realm completely from me.
The problem is I've been down that route and there's a nifty trick. It's a conspiracy until it was never an issue. That's another survival mechanism. The ones you're thinking about are the stickier ones like the moon landing, JFK, Crystalians, etc. which haven't been proven one way or the other. It's like progressive politics and them saying Socialism has never been proven wrong because any time it's tried it wasn't real socialism. Same same for conspiracy theories.
And yet, for every conspiracy theory proven right there are hundreds proven wrong. And even then for a conspiracy theory like MKULTRA which was proven right, that wasn't even malice, that was CIA incompetence. Great book on a lot of that is Legacy of Ashes.
And yet... It's really not. And it's not how it's ever been. That's the thing. That's why it's such a powerful tool because we are coded to read into things and come up with fictions.
Stephanie, I just finished reading this article and the other article, Arsonists and Gasoline in the sewers. I see we both realize the moon landing was faked, so that's a place of understanding that we can build from.
My questions are the following: do you think that these fires were started by arsonists and then fueled by the winds? That's what I'm getting, but I want to confirm. And if so, why do you rule out the possibility of more sophisticated arson like DEWs per se?
I ask because for one, do we know exactly why they faked the moon landing? We may not know why, but we DO know it was faked. I say its the same thing here. We know the technology does exist (e.g., DEW), so what's to stop them from using it and telling us it was arson spread by natural winds?
I wrote an article titled, "I don't know why they lie, but I know they're lying" and another on "rejecting the narrative." The idea is that we KNOW the mainstream media lies. So whatever convenient narrative they have, like "incompetence" we should reject it. If not, then we risk actually trusting the mainstream.
Another article I wrote called, "3 methods to understand narratives" ties to this. With every event, there's an official narrative, official conspiracy, and the unorthodox truth. I tend to agree with you here that LA 28 may be the official conspiracy, and so now the narratives are between the official narrative or the unorthodox truth. The mainstream media has lied so many times, that I'd be pressed to believe what they say.
Those are my thoughts though. Looking forward to your responses and here are the links mentioned:
My grandmother used to claim that it was always clear skies during a full moon.
My wife tells me that I always fail to wipe up drips on the kitchen drawers when cleaning the kitchen.
I have been told many times how much better they used to make buildings than they do today.
I tried to explain to my grandmother, "It's not always clear skies during a full moon, you only ever see the full moon when the skies are clear."
I have tried to explain to my wife, "I clean up drips all the time, but you can't see a cleaned-up drip so you don't think of it. You only see the times I miss one."
I've repeatedly made the point that the only old buildings you ever see are the ones built well enough to still be here. All the cheaply made buildings are long gone.
Conspiracy theories are correct sometimes, and when they are, a bunch of hoopla is made of it. But when they are wrong, the theory is forgotten. So what happens is that by only noticing the correct theories and forgetting all the incorrect ones, we mistakenly think far more are correct than really are. It's like seeing the full moon on a clear night, noticing drips in the kitchen, seeing only well-built old buildings.
The assertion that "they" would burn rundown central LA districts instead of the palisades is apparently based upon the premise that "they" would want an overall spiffier city.
No, they want the valuable seaside land. See Lahaina. And central LA isn't conveniently threaded by overgrown wooded canyons.
IDK if the fires were planned, but there is much that is suspicious.
And the "conspiracy theories" that have proven true just in the last 4 years are legion.
Sorry, I'n gonna keep looking for evidence and questioning everything.
The Palisades are not like Lahaina. First of all, it's not beachfront but in the hills, and the wealthy were already well ensconced in the Palisades. The "valuable seaside land" in LA with a historically poor area is Venice Beach, which developed a literal ghetto called Ghost Town over the years. All of Venice Beach became really run down in the 70s and 80s but rebounded a bit in the 90s. Venice Beach has been undergoing "natural" gentrification for decades now - no need for a massive natural disaster to do it. Really the big issue is the homeless.
I used to try to change peoples minds, show them pages of documents, get them to understand it's about patterns and where the patterns sit within the big picture.
Now I just wait 9-12months and the conspiracies are proven correct. I'm a lucky one, I've got plenty of time on my clock to wait.
Btw, if you haven't followed the excess deaths for each country closely....i can assure you, we are all still right on schedule.😐
Or you might want to actually read my article, as I never said there were *no* conspiracies. I just said these particular fires were most likely not due a conspiracy but other factors.
Thanks for saying what I’ve been thinking . Sometimes bad things happen because people make stupid decisions. And sometimes bad people start wars and take over countries and so on , apart from the cabal. The cabal is not omniscient and omnipotent. There are still good people in the world.
The evil cabal in the case of LA, is the incompetence at the top of the leadership, which spreads, down the chain to fuel the tangible results we see playing out right in front of us. A culmination of irresponsible but repetitive behaviors.
How far would democrats go to get our guns- I can not mention a lot of words to- my father was chief of some tribe. I waited on Ms. Carter I am a die hard Hilary supporter.
That was a nice little article and yes the Truther Movement has a very dark side indeed. It’s not about truthing but actually about hating. Finding whatever projection field necessary to project their hate onto, rather than dealing with actual complex nuanced situations. Just look at the hatred conjured up against Israel right now. And that’s a very strong emotion that gets conjured up and gets people stuck in lower dichotomy thinking - white / black, black / white - and never moves anything forward to higher ground at all. That’s the design of getting a collective stuck in the morass. Just look at the Covid truther movement: disembowelling each other for the “real truth” rather than working together to get the bigger picture. And I agree with the Conspiracy Blankie, it’s comforting to slap conspiracy by the Cabal on it all rather than facing difficult real life situations.
Now, the moon landing was real and yet I do understand why you’d think it wasn’t if only seen through the prism of ‘why aren’t we on the moon right now’. This has indirectly to do with the “drones”, which have been seen on and off for years in various locations by the way, and some very unpleasant shocking surprises coming in 2025. It was never about not getting there, but what they found what they did get there. Btw, for your amusement try David Yates Reverse Speech on the moon landing. That’s my two cents, and thank you!
Hanlons razor. Never attribute to malloce what can be properly explained by incompetence.
You’re proposing a 1/100 ratio but I’d estimate it’s closer to 100/1. Can you even give a few examples of conspiracy theories that have proven wrong? According to your statement there should be 1000’s to choose from.
And fucking with peoples brains isn’t malice? Bro you’re in a different realm completely from me.
The problem is I've been down that route and there's a nifty trick. It's a conspiracy until it was never an issue. That's another survival mechanism. The ones you're thinking about are the stickier ones like the moon landing, JFK, Crystalians, etc. which haven't been proven one way or the other. It's like progressive politics and them saying Socialism has never been proven wrong because any time it's tried it wasn't real socialism. Same same for conspiracy theories.
Maybe we are coded that way as a survival mechanism?
Today’s conspiracy is next years “we’ve all always known that”
People with high pattern recognition seem crazy to those who are lower on that scale. They are just ahead of schedule.
And yet, for every conspiracy theory proven right there are hundreds proven wrong. And even then for a conspiracy theory like MKULTRA which was proven right, that wasn't even malice, that was CIA incompetence. Great book on a lot of that is Legacy of Ashes.
I couldn’t disagree with this statement more. Malicious intent should be the default assumption these days.
And yet... It's really not. And it's not how it's ever been. That's the thing. That's why it's such a powerful tool because we are coded to read into things and come up with fictions.
Exactly this. PS For those who can't understand the type, he meant "malice."
I also can't edit from my phone! At least you know it's human generated 🤣
But Sandy Hook was an actual false flag. I’m not saying they all were, but you picked a poor example.
Stephanie, I just finished reading this article and the other article, Arsonists and Gasoline in the sewers. I see we both realize the moon landing was faked, so that's a place of understanding that we can build from.
My questions are the following: do you think that these fires were started by arsonists and then fueled by the winds? That's what I'm getting, but I want to confirm. And if so, why do you rule out the possibility of more sophisticated arson like DEWs per se?
I ask because for one, do we know exactly why they faked the moon landing? We may not know why, but we DO know it was faked. I say its the same thing here. We know the technology does exist (e.g., DEW), so what's to stop them from using it and telling us it was arson spread by natural winds?
I wrote an article titled, "I don't know why they lie, but I know they're lying" and another on "rejecting the narrative." The idea is that we KNOW the mainstream media lies. So whatever convenient narrative they have, like "incompetence" we should reject it. If not, then we risk actually trusting the mainstream.
Another article I wrote called, "3 methods to understand narratives" ties to this. With every event, there's an official narrative, official conspiracy, and the unorthodox truth. I tend to agree with you here that LA 28 may be the official conspiracy, and so now the narratives are between the official narrative or the unorthodox truth. The mainstream media has lied so many times, that I'd be pressed to believe what they say.
Those are my thoughts though. Looking forward to your responses and here are the links mentioned:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/i-dont-know-why-liars-lie-but-they
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-intellect-around-dramatic-events
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/3-key-methods-to-decode-official
"do you think that these fires were started by arsonists and then fueled by the winds?"
Some if not all of them, yes.
"And if so, why do you rule out the possibility of more sophisticated arson like DEWs per se?"
Partly common sense. Why use a cannon when a match could do? You could just drop a cigarette and start a massive fire with those weather conditions.
My grandmother used to claim that it was always clear skies during a full moon.
My wife tells me that I always fail to wipe up drips on the kitchen drawers when cleaning the kitchen.
I have been told many times how much better they used to make buildings than they do today.
I tried to explain to my grandmother, "It's not always clear skies during a full moon, you only ever see the full moon when the skies are clear."
I have tried to explain to my wife, "I clean up drips all the time, but you can't see a cleaned-up drip so you don't think of it. You only see the times I miss one."
I've repeatedly made the point that the only old buildings you ever see are the ones built well enough to still be here. All the cheaply made buildings are long gone.
Conspiracy theories are correct sometimes, and when they are, a bunch of hoopla is made of it. But when they are wrong, the theory is forgotten. So what happens is that by only noticing the correct theories and forgetting all the incorrect ones, we mistakenly think far more are correct than really are. It's like seeing the full moon on a clear night, noticing drips in the kitchen, seeing only well-built old buildings.
You just wait, another two weeks and, like every other conspiracy, this one will be news. Just sayin...
https://open.substack.com/pub/secularheretic/p/a-forensics-examination-of-video?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4xynww
The assertion that "they" would burn rundown central LA districts instead of the palisades is apparently based upon the premise that "they" would want an overall spiffier city.
No, they want the valuable seaside land. See Lahaina. And central LA isn't conveniently threaded by overgrown wooded canyons.
IDK if the fires were planned, but there is much that is suspicious.
And the "conspiracy theories" that have proven true just in the last 4 years are legion.
Sorry, I'n gonna keep looking for evidence and questioning everything.
The Palisades are not like Lahaina. First of all, it's not beachfront but in the hills, and the wealthy were already well ensconced in the Palisades. The "valuable seaside land" in LA with a historically poor area is Venice Beach, which developed a literal ghetto called Ghost Town over the years. All of Venice Beach became really run down in the 70s and 80s but rebounded a bit in the 90s. Venice Beach has been undergoing "natural" gentrification for decades now - no need for a massive natural disaster to do it. Really the big issue is the homeless.
Finally. I've felt as though I was alone in battling conspiracy theorists. Thank you.
I used to try to change peoples minds, show them pages of documents, get them to understand it's about patterns and where the patterns sit within the big picture.
Now I just wait 9-12months and the conspiracies are proven correct. I'm a lucky one, I've got plenty of time on my clock to wait.
Btw, if you haven't followed the excess deaths for each country closely....i can assure you, we are all still right on schedule.😐
#conspiracies65 #follownone #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
The conspiracy is far and away bigger than 15 minute cities. But, you do you.
Conspiracy theorists are on a winning streak. Might want to listen to them.
Or you might want to actually read my article, as I never said there were *no* conspiracies. I just said these particular fires were most likely not due a conspiracy but other factors.
Thanks for saying what I’ve been thinking . Sometimes bad things happen because people make stupid decisions. And sometimes bad people start wars and take over countries and so on , apart from the cabal. The cabal is not omniscient and omnipotent. There are still good people in the world.
The evil cabal in the case of LA, is the incompetence at the top of the leadership, which spreads, down the chain to fuel the tangible results we see playing out right in front of us. A culmination of irresponsible but repetitive behaviors.
Patents
Once anyone starts it does leave questions
How far would democrats go to get our guns- I can not mention a lot of words to- my father was chief of some tribe. I waited on Ms. Carter I am a die hard Hilary supporter.
Proof can be tough.
That was a nice little article and yes the Truther Movement has a very dark side indeed. It’s not about truthing but actually about hating. Finding whatever projection field necessary to project their hate onto, rather than dealing with actual complex nuanced situations. Just look at the hatred conjured up against Israel right now. And that’s a very strong emotion that gets conjured up and gets people stuck in lower dichotomy thinking - white / black, black / white - and never moves anything forward to higher ground at all. That’s the design of getting a collective stuck in the morass. Just look at the Covid truther movement: disembowelling each other for the “real truth” rather than working together to get the bigger picture. And I agree with the Conspiracy Blankie, it’s comforting to slap conspiracy by the Cabal on it all rather than facing difficult real life situations.
Now, the moon landing was real and yet I do understand why you’d think it wasn’t if only seen through the prism of ‘why aren’t we on the moon right now’. This has indirectly to do with the “drones”, which have been seen on and off for years in various locations by the way, and some very unpleasant shocking surprises coming in 2025. It was never about not getting there, but what they found what they did get there. Btw, for your amusement try David Yates Reverse Speech on the moon landing. That’s my two cents, and thank you!
It’s a great thing for republicans, this area is solid blue and donates millions. Well, that’s over.
Is this area in Newsomes plan of a Smart city??